Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-650 is 643 days older than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than FX-6100 - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$56.28 vs CA$80.8
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74400 minutes ago
Buy for CA$56.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |