Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 1020 days newer than Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-650 - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |