Buy on Amazon
CA$41.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 869 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1620 - 274 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-760 - CA$36.89 vs CA$41.21
- Up to 7% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-760 - CA$0.14 vs CA$0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
274
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
89%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I5-760 I5 760 2.8 GHz Used Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
272
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
