Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 778 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - CA$41.21 vs CA$143.97
- Up to 70% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-3220 - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-760 - 237 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
234
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$143.97
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$143.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |