Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 27% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - CA$32.99 vs CA$44.99
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1620 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74493 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74493 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
