Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1620 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1620 is 869 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-760 - CA$36.89 vs CA$41.21
- Up to 11% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-760 - CA$0.17 vs CA$0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16169 minutes ago
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |