Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1620 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1620 is 514 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 10% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - CA$36.89 vs CA$41.21
- Up to 10% better value when playing Control than Celeron G1840 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16442 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1840 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 2M 53W LGA1150
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
