Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 0% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - CA$36.89 vs CA$36.99
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 2% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1620 - 197 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
99%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
