Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-4300 - 155 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 28% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - CA$36.09 vs CA$49.99
- Up to 25% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G4900 - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |