Buy on Amazon
CA$36.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1043 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - CA$36.09 vs CA$88.88
- Up to 59% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G4400 - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-4300 - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2666 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
40%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
