Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than FX-4300 - 204 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$36.09 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 58% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.23 vs CA$0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |