Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4013 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than Core i5-2300 - 90 vs 79 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$44.35 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 56% better value when playing Remnant II than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.56 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
90
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
79
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |