Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$87.12 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 21% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.49 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8150 - 183 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
178
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15061 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |