Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4130 - 208 vs 198 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$85.99 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |