Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - CA$98.43 vs CA$153.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 5 2600X - CA$0.15 vs CA$0.22 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than FX-6100 - 708 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
670
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
708
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |