Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$98.43 vs CA$142.72
- Up to 24% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.51 vs CA$0.67 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6100 - 214 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
194
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
76%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |