Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 444 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3200G - 231 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$142.95 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$290
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10203 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |