Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$142.95 vs CA$324.72
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 38% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 228 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
165
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16163 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
228
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$324.72
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$324.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |