Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 817 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3200G - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$141.17 vs CA$142.95
- Up to 2% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$1.2 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |