Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4770 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4770 is 1782 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$128.88 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10929 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10929 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |