Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1356 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 2600 - 170 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$112.98 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.66 vs CA$1.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10665 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |