Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1729 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 391 vs 318 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$112.98 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.29 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |