Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 620 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$113.5 vs CA$265.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G6900 - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
95.98802395209582%
Multi-Core
2696
46.538926290350425%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |