Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - CA$112.98 vs CA$290.18
- Up to 56% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11600KF - CA$0.95 vs CA$2.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Celeron G6900 - 135 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
119
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.15/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$290.18
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$290.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |