Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700K - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - CA$265.0 vs CA$482.09
- Up to 46% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700K - CA$1.46 vs CA$2.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for CA$482.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |