Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7700K - 146 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - CA$304.99 vs CA$359.88
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7700K - CA$2.09 vs CA$2.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$359.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10691 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |