Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$265.0 vs CA$378.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i9-10900F - CA$2.3 vs CA$3.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Ryzen 3 3300X - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 20 vs 8 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
115
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.26/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$378
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |