Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 215 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$280.0 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900F - CA$1.49 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$388
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
188
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |