Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 5 1600 - 730 vs 700 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$105.16 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.15 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
730
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$388
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
700
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$105.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$105.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |