Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3600 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$169.22 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900F - CA$1.11 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
51.86915887850467%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
153
99.35064935064936%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$169.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$169.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1597
95.28639618138425%
Multi-Core
6884
81.69950154284358%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |