Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10105 - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$151.99 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 53% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.85 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
46.7032967032967%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51184 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
98.89502762430939%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$151.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$151.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1487
88.72315035799522%
Multi-Core
4609
54.699738903394255%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |