Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Core i7-6900K - 785 vs 759 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$159.99 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 39% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.2 vs CA$0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
785
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |