Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i5-10600K have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$199.99 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 40% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
60.16949152542372%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
60%
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51207 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$199.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1658
98.92601431980907%
Multi-Core
6838
81.15357227628768%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |