Buy on Amazon
CA$329.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 3 3200G - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$133.07 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 58% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
41.75824175824176%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
40%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51185 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
174
96.13259668508287%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.07
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
62.76849642004774%
Multi-Core
3013
35.75836695941135%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
