Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 444 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$133.07 vs CA$158.07
- Up to 15% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$1.14 vs CA$1.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3200G - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
117
99.15254237288136%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48134 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
85.07462686567163%
Price, CA$
CA$158.07
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
94.43447037701975%
Multi-Core
3013
54.891601384587354%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Picasso | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |