Buy on Amazon
CA$158.27
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 961 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$158.27 vs CA$197.32
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-6700T - CA$0.94 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.27
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 R7 2700 3.2 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 65W CPU Processor Socket AM4 YD2700BBM88AF
Buy for CA$158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$197.32
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$197.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
