Buy on Amazon
CA$484.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2369 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-2700K - 476 vs 458 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$135.68 vs CA$484.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$0.3 vs CA$1.02 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
476
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.02/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$484.99
27%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for CA$484.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
458
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$135.68
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 95W LGA1155
Buy for CA$135.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
