Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 264 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$117.88 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$117.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$117.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |