Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - CA$158.27 vs CA$199.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-10600K - CA$0.62 vs CA$0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 2700 - 274 vs 257 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
257
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4145 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
274
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$199.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |