Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2600 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$142.72 vs CA$329.49
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.96 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
44.85981308411214%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51208 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
96.75324675324676%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
68.73508353221956%
Multi-Core
4841
57.453121291241395%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |