Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3400G - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$173.55 vs CA$329.49
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74373 minutes ago
Buy for CA$173.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.30310262529832%
Multi-Core
3619
42.95039164490861%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |