Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Core i3-10105F - 207 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$99.99 vs CA$378.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.51 vs CA$1.83 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$378
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |