Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$99.99 vs CA$319.3
- Up to 66% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.37 vs CA$1.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10105F - 290 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
290
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |