Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 326 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$79.99 vs CA$265.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$0.61 vs CA$1.95 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - 136 vs 132 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
97.05882352941177%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.95/FPS
31.28205128205128%
Price, CA$
CA$265
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
87.06586826347305%
Multi-Core
4472
77.19661660624892%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |