Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$89.99 vs CA$257.46
- Up to 59% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10105F - 802 vs 713 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
713
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13353 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
802
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$257.46
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |