Buy on Amazon
CA$378
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-8100 - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$125.0 vs CA$378.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.56 vs CA$1.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$378
33%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$378 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
223
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$125
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores Up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for CA$125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
