Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-6100 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$98.43 vs CA$378.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.55 vs CA$2.05 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$378
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
178
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |