Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - CA$98.43 vs CA$189.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-13100 - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 24% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-6100 - 275 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
222
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
275
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$189
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |