Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - CA$98.43 vs CA$175.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10500 - CA$0.84 vs CA$1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6100 - 133 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
117
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$175
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |