Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570 is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-4570 - CA$98.43 vs CA$144.43
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-4570 - CA$0.72 vs CA$0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6100 - 167 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
137
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$144.43
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$144.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |